Coordinated Universal Time (= UTC = EST+5 = EDT+4): 20160503T0002Z
TO:
* MPozzebon@metrusdev.com
__David Dunlap Observatory and Park property-developer project manager
Mr Michael Pozzebon
__as a channel of contact for the DeGasperis family
(as aspiring DDO&P developers)
* dbronskill@goodmans.ca
__David Dunlap Observatory and Park property-developer lawyer
Mr David Bronskill
__as a channel of contact for the DeGasperis family
(as aspiring DDO&P developers)
* info@observatoryhill.ca
__a general mailbox for the envisaged
520- or 530-home David Dunlap Observatory and Park subdivision
__as a channel of contact for the DeGasperis and Muzzo families
(as aspiring DDO&P developers)
* info@marel.to
__for Marel Contractors
__as a channel of contact for the Muzzo family
(as aspiring DDO&P developers)
* officemayor@richmondhill.ca,
vito.spatafora@richmondhill.ca,
brenda.hogg@richmondhill.ca,
greg@gregberos.com,
tom.muench@richmondhill.ca,
castro.liu@richmondhill.ca,
david.west@richmondhill.ca,
karen.cilevitz@richmondhill.ca,
godwin.chan@richmondhill.ca
__as municipal authorities relevant to the
David Dunlap Observatory and Park heritage-conservation case
* shelton@astro.utoronto.ca, sheltonfam2001@hotmail.com,
sn87a@hotmail.com
__as contact mailboxes for the current key officer of the
(somewhat misleadingly named,
in fact not fully heritage-conservation-supportive)
"David Dunlap Observatory Defenders"
* Jason@cherniaklaw.com, virginia@virginiamaclean.com
__additional lawyers in one way or another
relevantly linked to the DDO&P heritage-conservation case
* attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, tmcmeekin.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org,
premier@ontario.ca, rmoridi.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org
__Ontario provincial authorities
relevant to the DDO&P heritage-conservation case
* justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca, rona.ambrose@parl.gc.ca,
thomas.mulcair@parl.gc.ca, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca,
Majid.Jowhari@parl.gc.ca
__Canadian federal authorities
relevant to the DDO&P heritage-conservation case
* nuntiatura@nuntiatura.ca, archbishop@archtoronto.org
__ecclesial authorities
relevant to the DDO&P heritage-conservation case
* nationaltrust@nationaltrustcanada.ca
__an additional public or quasi-public authority
relevant to the DDO&P heritage-conservation case
* mbeck@yrmg.com, KZarzour@yrmg.com
(community-newspaper) media authorities
immediately relevant to the DDO&P heritage-conservation case
* news@nowtoronto.com, editorial@torontolife.com,
Newsroom@globeandmail.ca, gmason@globeandmail.com,
city@thestar.ca, hmallick@thestar.ca,
jfiorito@thestar.ca, jennifercheng@postcity.com,
letters@macleans.ca, letters@torontolife.com
__media authorities
more remotely relevant to the DDO&P heritage-conservation case
WITH SUBSEQUENT FORWARDS TO:
* persons active at the Richmond Hill Naturalists,
or active in other branches of the southern-Ontario
heritage conservation and greenspace conservation
* possible other persons or institutions
FROM: Toomas (Tom) Karmo
__lay Catholic pursuing perceived lay (non-diocesan)
vocation as religious hermit, within the ordinary
disciplines of the Catholic laity
__2006-November-thru-2008-June employee
of David Dunlap Observatory
__blogger since 2016 April at
http://toomaskarmo.blogspot.com
RE: DDO&P conservation: blog launched
(analyses of 2012 OMB, of UofT possible-ongoing, etc)
......................................................................
Dear observers of
David Dunlap Observatory and Park ("DDO&P")
heritage-conservation case:
This present e-mail is a further transmission in the series
of mailings which I am trying to make to all of you, every
few months, describing the state of my DDO&P casework.
I have now launched a blog, serving the purpose of DDO&P
conservation advocacy and various other purposes, at
http://toomaskarmo.blogspot.com.
(A) Within this blog, I sometimes touch in various, sometimes minor
and sometimes major, ways on DDO&P.
It is necessary for me to draw to your attention a rather major
discussion of DDO&P, in my blog posting of 2016-04-26,
entitled "Essay on Sorrow - Its Anatomy and Its Remedies".
The following aspects of this 2016-04-26 essay should be noted:
* an analysis of the surprising Ontario Municipal Board
development of 2012-09-10, when a lawyer I identify
in the blog as "MM", ostensibly retained at my
prodigious expense to argue the conservationist case
for the Richmond Hill Naturalists,
in fact seems to have departed from client instructions
in a way helpful to our pro-development adversary;
in this essay, I reiterate my earlier appeals for
"MM" to set up a clarifying meeting with me,
so that I can in my admitted poverty settle
her outstanding bill
* an analysis of the particular sorrows of the would-be
developers, the DeGasperis and Muzzo families,
with reference to
+ my putative 2008 encounter with
the late Alfredo DeGasperis (I believe he was
then investigating me, in a kindly way)
+ the case of 2016 convict Marco M. Muzzo
(a nephew of the would-be DDO&P property-development
firm Corsica)
+ the discouraging 2016-04-18 (MON)
resumption of development work on the DDO&P greenspace,
after an encouraging hiatus lasting some months
+ the need for the DeGasperis and Muzzo families
to respond to my repeated entreaties for a private
meeting with them, so that we can as Catholics
discuss our points of ethical agreement and our points
of ethical disagreement, safely in advance of my
envisaged legal (nonobstructive) 2016 picket of their
envisaged DDO&P-subdivision 2016 sales centre
* an analysis of the
(limited, but real) evidence suggesting,
contrary to ordinary public appearances,
a continuing financial University of Toronto stake
in the projected DDO&P subdivision
(B) It should additionally be noted that my various
philosophical or political disputants need a platform in which
they can engage me in open, uncensored, debate. I indicate
in the blog posting of 2016-04-14, entitled "Background FAQ,
regarding purpose and conduct of this blog", that my blog
is such a platform. I there pretty much lay out the terms on which
adversarial persons or institutions can post on DDO&P. It is (I
pretty much just recapitulate those terms in this present e-mail
paragraph) both necessary and sufficient that the envisaged
posting be accompanied by contact particulars, and that it
refrain from abusive language. My policy is not to censor any
offered DDO&P-pertinent essays, although I do reserve the usual
blogger's right to reply to my guest essayists in blog-comment format.
(C) I state in my blog, but may as well also state here in this
present e-mail, that I am now too poor to afford a lawyer,
and that I therefore envisage attempting to self-represent
in any court proceedings which anyone may at any stage desire
to launch.
(D) This present e-mail from me to you serves as a kind of
model of how I seek to conduct my e-mail operations: I
receive or transmit DDO&P-relevant e-mail, and then (if the
mail is in any way important) I post to the blog, for everyone
to read. I do this in a kind of Wikileaks, or Snowden, or
Mossack-Fonseca-probe spirit of openness. With the advent of
the Internet, we may at last be able make progress toward Sir
Karl Popper's old ideal of an "Open Society".
Respectfully,
Toomas Karmo
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are moderated. For comment-moderation rules, see initial posting on this blog (2016-04-14).